{"id":234,"date":"2024-10-26T04:40:19","date_gmt":"2024-10-26T04:40:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/?p=234"},"modified":"2024-10-26T04:40:19","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T04:40:19","slug":"human-rights-natural-law-and-world-peace-by-mark-arnold","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/2024\/10\/26\/human-rights-natural-law-and-world-peace-by-mark-arnold\/","title":{"rendered":"Human Rights, Natural Law And World Peace\u2014By Mark Arnold"},"content":{"rendered":"

Note: I originally wrote and published this article in 2018. I am republishing it now, as its message of our Natural Human Rights and their relationship to the accomplishment of world peace is something everyone should understand. Please read and share. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Thank you! MA<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

_____________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Martin Luther King<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

N<\/strong>ot too long ago, while doing some research, I came across an article written in 1963 by\u00a0Dr. Martin Luther King<\/em><\/strong>. Today the article is called\u00a0\u201cLetter From A Birmingham Jail,\u201d\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>and it was written by King during one of his civil rights campaigns in Birmingham, Alabama. As the article\u2019s title indicates, it was written while the civil rights leader was sitting in jail, having been arrested during one of the campaign\u2019s protests, in response to published criticisms from white Birmingham clergymen who claimed that in taking to the streets and engaging in civil disobedience King and his followers were pursuing the wrong course. Though they agreed that racial injustice and inequities existed, the white clergymen felt that the proper place for King to carry on his crusade was in the courts, and not in the streets. (If you have not read King\u2019s article itself, you can access it here: http:\/\/fromanativeson.com\/2018\/04\/05\/martin-luther-king-letter-from-a-birmingham-jail\/<\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0)<\/p>\n

The eloquence and wisdom of King\u2019s writing speaks for itself, far beyond anything I could say about it here; but there is an idea that he refers to in his article that I find especially significant, and that is the concept of what he and other philosophers call \u201cnatural law\u201d or \u201cmoral law\u201d(also \u201ceternal law\u201d or \u201cGod\u2019s law\u201d\u2014all efforts to say the same thing).\u201d King explains this concept in this quote from his article:<\/p>\n

\u201cYou express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court\u2019s decision of 1954[1]<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may well ask: \u2018How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?\u2019 The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine\u00a0[2]<\/strong><\/a> that \u2018an unjust law is no law at all.\u2019\u00a0 Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.\u00a0<\/strong>To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas\u00a0[3]<\/strong><\/a>:\u00a0An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.\u00a0<\/strong>Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. Segregation, to use the terminology of the Jewish philosopher Martin Buber\u00a0[4]<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0substitutes an \u2018I\u2013it\u2019 relationship for an \u2018I\u2013thou\u2019 relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. Hence segregation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and sinful.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Mahatma Gandhi<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

When I read this section in King\u2019s article I immediately stopped, and then read it again\u2014and then again. Of course, what you are looking at in those few sentences is the philosophical underpinning of the entire Civil Rights movement in America,\u00a0Mahatma Gandhi\u2019s\u00a0[5]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>\u00a0nationalist independence movement in India across the 1930s and 40s, the late 1700s revolutions in what is now the United States and in France; and before that going all the way back to\u00a0Magna Carta<\/em>\u00a0(England, 1215) and philosophers in ancient Greece. And I believe, moving into the future, it will be the philosophical basis of every great movement towards freedom yet to come.<\/p>\n

Why would this be so?<\/p>\n

Because the statement that there is such a thing as \u201cnatural law\u201d is, quite simply, true. I believe this and, speaking just for me now, I know it is the case. Every effort by man on planet Earth to enumerate his unalienable rights, from the U.S.\u00a0Bill of Rights\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Thomas Paine\u2019s<\/em>\u00a0\u201cThe Rights of Man\u201d\u00a0[6]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>\u00a0in the late 1700s, to the English\u00a0Magna Carta<\/em>\u00a0in 1215, in which the traditional right of\u00a0habeus corpus[7]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>\u00a0is majorly upheld and reinforced; all the way up to the United Nation\u2019s\u00a0Universal Declaration of Human Rights[8]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>\u00a0in 1948, are simply efforts to illuminate and describe these \u201cnatural\u201d or \u201cmoral\u201d laws. Whether some of these efforts succeed at this better than others is not for me to say; but that is what they are, and if we truly want world peace the effort to institutionalize these \u201cnatural laws\u201d should be lauded and supported.<\/p>\n

\"The

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/p><\/div>\n

Speaking of world peace, the above sheds major light on just how that long sought condition can be accomplished. \u00a0At first glance it can appear that the assertion of natural rights and law can precipitate violence. In insisting on their natural rights and in refusing to follow \u201cimmoral law\u201d King, Gandhi and their followers elicited violent responses from their suppressors in the United States and the British Empire. As the white Birmingham clergymen accused King of, it appeared that the violence was the result of the protests. This, however, is a false observation; for as King pointed out in his article, and as\u00a0St. Augustine<\/em>\u00a0stated much earlier,\u00a0\u201c\u2026an unjust law is no law at all.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0In these examples with the U.S. and Great Britain vis-\u00e0-vis the Civil Rights Movement and the Indian Nationalist Movement, both the oppressors in enforcing the unjust laws, and the oppressed if they went along with them, would be, alike, sinning. The oppressed are moral and duty bound to not follow \u201cunjust\u201d laws, just as those in power are moral and duty bound not to enforce them. Looking at it this way assigns the responsibility for violence to those to whom it truly belongs; those who enforce unjust and immoral laws with violence. This also explains why both King, and before him Gandhi, were so adamant in insisting that their movements be non-violent. They had to, lest they and their people become inadvertently involved in violating the natural rights of their oppressors. They both intuitively understood that would be sinful. It is an interesting aside that in this we witness one of the major reasons for the collapse of otherwise good and sound movements on this planet: they start to engage in actions that violate the natural rights of those opposing them, and therefore cave themselves in while, at the same time, giving justification to those who wish to wipe them out.<\/p>\n

Probably the theologian in relatively recent times who had the best grasp of Human Rights and Natural Law as a necessary condition for world peace, and who wrote eloquently about it, was none other than\u00a0Pope John XXIII<\/em>. Though he only held the post for 5 years (1958-1963) Pope John is one of the most beloved and respected pontiffs in modern history. In April of 1963 he published his landmark encyclical\u00a0[9]<\/a>\u00a0Pacem in terris (Peace on earth),\u00a0<\/em>in which he explained his view that the accomplishment of world peace depended in the main on the leaders, governments and people of the world maintaining what Pope John called\u00a0\u201c\u2026diligent observance of the divinely established order.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Pope John XXIII<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Before I go further I think it is important to understand the context of the times in which Pope John issued\u00a0Pacem in terris<\/em>. The world had only recently breathed a sigh of relief when the most dangerous two-week period in human history, the Cuban Missile Crisis, was successfully resolved in late October, 1962. Pope John himself had played a significant role in its resolution, when on October 25, at the height of the Crisis, he issued his\u00a0plea for moral responsibility\u00a0<\/em>by world leaders, in which he said:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe implore all rulers not to remain deaf to the cry of humanity for peace. That they do all that is in their power to save peace. They will thus spare the world from the horrors of a war whose terrifying consequences no one can predict. That they continue discussions, as this loyal and open behavior has great value as a witness of everyone\u2019s conscience and before history. Promoting, favoring, accepting conversations, at all levels and at any time, is a maxim of wisdom and prudence which attracts the blessings of heaven and earth.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Pope John\u2019s message was widely published around the world, even in the Soviet newspaper\u00a0Pravda.\u00a0<\/em>Indeed, Soviet Premier\u00a0Nikita Khrushchev\u00a0[10]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>\u00a0would later state that at the time it was issued Pope John\u2019s plea was the\u00a0\u201conly gleam of hope\u201d<\/em>\u00a0in an otherwise dark situation. A few days later President Kennedy and Khrushchev negotiated a successful conclusion to the Crisis when the Soviets agreed to remove their missiles from Cuba in exchange for a U.S. pledge to not invade that island and to remove its missiles from Turkey.<\/p>\n

With the Crisis resolved, and knowing that he only had a short time to live due to terminal stomach cancer, Pope John next turned his attention to doing everything he could to promote an end to the Cold War and the arms race and to bring peace to Earth. This led to a remarkable yet little known series of exchanges initiated by the Pope to promote communication between President Kennedy and Premier Khrushchev. To accomplish this Pope John sent a messenger to a Catholic pacifist magazine publisher in the U.S. named\u00a0Norman Cousins[11]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>, and asked him if he would be willing to serve as his emissary to Khrushchev in the Soviet Union. The purpose would be to deliver Pope John\u2019s messages to the Premier, to represent the Pope to him, and to deliver the Premier\u2019s communication back to the Pope. In the process of setting this up Cousins contacted the U.S. State Department to coordinate with the Kennedy administration, and so in effect became Kennedy\u2019s emissary as well.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Norman Cousins<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Cousins would make two trips to see Khrushchev on behalf of Pope John and JFK, and before the second one, in early April, 1963, he visited the Vatican and was provided with a special advance copy of\u00a0Pacem in terris<\/em>\u00a0(which had not been broadly published yet) to deliver to the Soviet Premier. At the time Pope John was critically ill; and though Cousins had hoped to meet with the pontiff personally, he was not able to. Nevertheless, with the Pope\u2019s encyclical in hand, Cousins travelled to the Soviet Union and fulfilled his mission of hand delivering it to Nikita Khrushchev.<\/p>\n

Though it is hard to say it was caused solely by\u00a0Pacem in terris<\/em>, across the next few months there was a noticeable thaw in Soviet-American relations. Pope John succumbed to his cancer on June 3, 1963, and exactly one week later, on June 10, 1963, JFK delivered what is probably his greatest speech ever at the Commencement ceremony for graduating seniors at American University in Washington DC; a speech known today as Kennedy\u2019s \u201cPeace Speech.\u201d The speech was stunning for its time because it called for Americans to completely reevaluate their considerations about both the Soviet Union and the subject of peace, something unheard of for the Cold War era. A few weeks later negotiations between the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union resumed on a treaty, the purpose of which was to ban the testing of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere. The treaty (known as the Limited Test Ban Treaty), which had been under on and off negotiation for the prior 8 years, had hung up on a disagreement over the number of inspections the U.S. required of Soviet nuclear testing sites. Khrushchev in particular had been upset over what he felt were shifting U.S. demands as to the number of inspections, so much so that negotiations had broken off a few months earlier in March.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Nikita Khrushchev<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

With the resumption of the negotiations the U.S. and the Soviet Union very rapidly resolved the points of disagreement and within 10 days of resuming talks, on July 25, 1963, the three nations reached agreement on the treaty. The next challenge was getting the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty, a task that at first seemed impossible due to the prevailing Cold War mentality of the Senators, and the fact that a 2\/3rds majority was required. Over the next 7 weeks, however, JFK, with the help of Norman Cousins and a group of government officials and private citizens, conducted an intensive lobbying effort that turned the tide; and on September 24, 1963, by a vote of 80 to 19, far more than the required 2\/3rds, the Senate ratified the Limited Test Ban Treaty. The \u201cimpossible\u201d had been accomplished.<\/p>\n

I can\u2019t prove it, but my personal belief is that without Pope John and his historic work\u00a0Pacem in terris,\u00a0<\/em>there would have been no Kennedy \u201cPeace Speech\u201d at American University, and there would have been no Limited Test Ban Treaty. I believe that the Pope\u2019s words had a major impact on JFK, who was himself, Catholic; and I believe that they affected Khrushchev as well. When one reads Pope John\u2019s words for himself one is left to wonder, how could they not?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
JFK signs the Limited Test Ban Treaty<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Much of what follows is quoted directly from\u00a0Pacem in terris<\/em>. Addressed to\u00a0\u201cAll men of good will\u201d,\u00a0<\/em>it was the first Papal encyclical that intended a larger audience than Catholics. The text of the encyclical then commences as follows:<\/p>\n

\u201cPeace on Earth\u2014which man throughout the ages has so longed for and sought after\u2014can never be established, never guaranteed, except by the diligent observance of the divinely established order\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

It then goes on to describe this\u00a0\u201cdivinely established order\u201d\u00a0<\/em>as the work of God and that it is perfect in its creation. And yet, Pope John states:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026there is a disunity<\/em>\u00a0among individuals and among nations which is in striking contrast to this perfect order in the universe. One would think that the relationships that bind men together could only be governed by force.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

As he progresses through the message of the encyclical Pope John emphasizes that world peace can only be accomplished by adherence to the\u00a0\u201cdivine order\u201d<\/em>\u00a0as manifested within each individual person; thus, a huge part of his encyclical deals with the subject of human rights, at times sounding not unlike the founding documents of the United States. The Pope introduces this section of\u00a0\u201cPacem in<\/em>\u00a0terris\u201d<\/em>\u00a0as follows:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
\u201cPacem in terris\u201d<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cWe must devote our attention first of all to that order which should prevail among men \u2026 Any well-regulated and productive association of men in society demands the acceptance of one fundamental principle: that each individual man is truly a person. His is a nature that is endowed with intelligence and free will. As such he has rights and duties, which together flow as a direct consequence from his nature. These rights and duties are universal and inviolable, and therefore altogether inalienable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The encyclical then goes on to enumerate these rights, reading much like the\u00a0\u201cUniversal Declaration of Human Rights\u201d<\/em>\u00a0passed by the\u00a0United Nations<\/em>\u00a0in 1948. Indeed, later in the encyclical the Pope makes special mention of this document:\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c<\/em>A clear proof of the farsightedness of this organization (the UN) is provided by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights passed by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. The preamble of this declaration affirms that the genuine recognition and complete observance of all the rights and freedoms outlined in the declaration is a goal to be sought by all peoples and all nations.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

As regards the natural duties of each individual person, derived from the same natural law as their rights, the Pope states:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe natural rights of which we have so far been speaking are inextricably bound up with as many duties, all applying to one and the same person. These rights and duties derive their origin, their sustenance, and their indestructibility from the natural law, which in conferring the one imposes the other.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

It is clear from Pope John\u2019s\u00a0\u201cPacem in terris\u201d<\/em>\u00a0that he felt bringing about peace on our planet would require an adherence to these natural rights and duties by governments and men, and that a real peace could not be attained without this. As stated by Pope John:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe common good of individual States is something that cannot be determined without reference to the human person, and the same is true of the common good of all States taken together. Hence the public authority of the world community must likewise have as its special aim the recognition, respect, safeguarding and promotion of the rights of the human person.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cPacem in terris\u201d<\/em>\u00a0makes the point that to arrive at the level of mutual trust necessary between nations to attain peace, people and their nations would first have to arrive at this recognition of the fundamental nature of man and his inherent rights. The encyclical then challenges the world\u2019s people and leaders to do just that\u2026stated as follows:<\/p>\n

\u201cHence among the very serious obligations incumbent upon men of high principles, we must include the task of establishing new relationships in human society, under the mastery and guidance of truth, justice, charity and freedom\u2014relations between individual citizens, between citizens and their respective States, between States, and finally between individuals, families, intermediate associations and States on the one hand, and the world community on the other. There is surely no one who will not consider this a most exalted task, for it is one which is able to bring about true peace in accordance with divinely established order.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Of such is the document,\u00a0\u201cPacem in Terris,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0by Pope John XXIII, published on April 11, 1963.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

As noted above, Pope John passed away on June 3, 1963, and a week later JFK delivered his \u201cPeace Speech\u201d at American University. That Kennedy understood the point of Pope John\u2019s words is evident by his own words, spoken in his famous speech:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
JFK at American University<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cAll this is not unrelated to world peace,\u201d\u00a0<\/em>Kennedy said.\u00a0\u201c\u2018When a man\u2019s ways please the Lord,\u2019 the Scriptures tell us, \u2018he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.\u2019 And is not peace, in the last analysis, basically a matter of human rights\u2014the right to live out our lives without fear of devastation\u2014the right to breathe air as nature provided it\u2014the right of future generations to a healthy existence?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Without the influence of\u00a0Pacem in terris<\/em>, I don\u2019t think Kennedy speaks those words, and I don\u2019t think the Limited Test Ban Treaty that followed would have happened.<\/p>\n

Thus, we, today, have our legacy, and it is clear.\u00a0Martin Luther King<\/em>,\u00a0John Kennedy<\/em>,\u00a0Pope John<\/em>\u00a0and even\u00a0Nikita Khrushchev<\/em>\u00a0are all gone now. So are\u00a0Thomas<\/em>\u00a0Jefferson, Thomas Paine, John Locke\u00a0[12]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>\u00a0and, going earlier,\u00a0Thomas Acquinas<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0St. Augustine.\u00a0<\/em>Their words, however, live on, and we must let them speak to us; for in them is the universal truth, probably best summated by Pope John in his great work:<\/p>\n

\u201cAny well-regulated and productive association of men in society demands the acceptance of one fundamental principle: that each individual man is truly a person. His is a nature that is endowed with intelligence and free will. As such he has rights and duties, which together flow as a direct consequence from his nature. These rights and duties are universal and inviolable, and therefore altogether inalienable.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

The duty of carrying this truth forward now falls to us, and in this task we must not fail; for if we do, the dream of a world at peace\u2014real peace\u2014will remain just that\u2014an unrealized dream.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Copyright \u00a9 2018<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

By Mark Arnold<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

All Rights Reserved<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

____________________________________<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[1]<\/a>\u00a0Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka<\/em><\/strong>, (1954),was a landmark\u00a0<\/em>U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate\u00a0public schools\u00a0for black and white students to be unconstitutional. Handed down on May 17, 1954, the\u00a0unanimous (9\u20130) decision stated that \u201cseparate educational facilities are inherently unequal.\u201d As a result,\u00a0racial segregation was ruled a violation of the\u00a0Equal Protection Clause of the\u00a014th<\/sup>\u00a0Amendment of the\u00a0United States Constitution. This ruling paved the way for\u00a0integration and was a major victory of the Civil Rights Movement.<\/em><\/p>\n

[2]<\/a>\u00a0Saint Augustine\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>(354 AD-430 AD) was an early Christian theologian and philosopher who was one of the major fathers of the early Christian Church. One of the most prolific writers of the early Church, his work was instrumental in the development of Western Christianity and Philosophy. Augustine\u2019s ideas had a vast effect on Martin Luther, thus many Protestants and Lutherans consider him to be one of the theological fathers of the Protestant Reformation.<\/em><\/p>\n

[3]<\/a>\u00a0Saint Thomas Aquinas<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>(1225-1274 AD) was an extremely influential Catholic priest, philosopher, jurist and theologian whose ideas are still studied and used extensively, both within the Church and without. He was the leading proponent of what is termed \u201cnatural theology\u201d, which basically argues that the existence of God is best demonstrated by logic and the ordinary experience of nature.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

[4]<\/a>\u00a0Martin Buber\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>(1878-1965) was a Jewish existentialist philosopher\u00a0widely renowned for his book \u201cI and Thou\u201d\u00a0(1923) which presents a philosophy of personal dialogue, in that it describes how personal dialogue can define the nature of reality. Buber\u2019s major theme is that human existence may be defined by the way in which we engage in dialogue with each other, with the world, and with God.<\/em>\u00a0According to Buber, human beings may adopt two attitudes toward the world:\u00a0I-Thou\u00a0or\u00a0I-It.\u00a0I-Thou\u00a0is a relation of subject-to-subject, while\u00a0I-It\u00a0is a relation of subject-to-object. In the\u00a0I-Thou\u00a0relationship, human beings are aware of each other as having a unity of being. In the\u00a0I-Thou\u00a0relationship, human beings do not perceive each other as consisting of specific, isolated qualities, but engage in a dialogue involving each other\u2019s whole being. In the\u00a0I-It\u00a0relationship, on the other hand, human beings perceive each other as consisting of specific, isolated qualities, and view themselves as part of a world which consists of things.\u00a0I-Thou\u00a0is a relationship of mutuality and reciprocity, while\u00a0I-It\u00a0is a relationship of separateness and detachment.<\/em><\/p>\n

[5]<\/a>\u00a0Mahatma Gandhi<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0(born Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, 1869-1948) was the primary leader of India\u2019s independence movement against British rule, and also the architect of a form of non-violent civil disobedience that would have a vast influence on the world, including specifically on U.S. Civil Rights leader\u00a0Martin Luther King<\/strong>\u00a0and South Africa\u2019s\u00a0Nelson Mandela<\/strong>. Gandhi trained to be an attorney in London from 1888-91, and prior to leading the Indian nationalist movement was a major civil rights leader in South Africa up until 1913, when he returned to India. Himself a Hindu, as Gandhi got older and became more famous he became known as \u201cMahatma\u201d, which means \u201cgreat soul,\u201d and was known for promoting religious tolerance between India\u2019s major religions, Hinduism and Islam. After decades leading the nationalist movement in India, Gandhi\u2019s country gained its independence at last in 1947. A few months later, at the age of 78, he was assassinated by a Hindu extremist.<\/em><\/p>\n

[6]<\/a>\u00a0Thomas Paine\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>(1737-1809) was an English-born political philosopher and writer who supported revolutionary causes in America and Europe. Published in 1776 to international acclaim, his\u00a0Common Sense\u00a0<\/strong>was the first pamphlet to advocate American independence. After writing the\u00a0The American Crisis\u00a0<\/strong>papers during the Revolutionary War, Paine returned to Europe and offered a stirring defense of the French Revolution with\u00a0Rights of Man<\/strong>. His political views led to a stint in prison; after his release, he produced his last great essay,\u00a0The Age of Reason<\/strong>, a controversial critique of institutionalized religion and Christian theology. Paine wrote\u00a0Rights of Man<\/strong>\u00a0in 1791 as a response to a critique of the French Revolution by Anglo-Irish statesman\u00a0Edmund Burke.\u00a0<\/strong>In it Paine stridently defended the right of a people to revolt when a government does not safeguard their natural rights.<\/em><\/p>\n

[7]<\/a>\u00a0King John\u2019s\u00a0Magna Carta<\/strong>\u00a0guaranteed to all free men immunity from illegal imprisonment, a guarantee that has traditionally been invoked by way of the writ of\u00a0habeas corpus<\/strong>. Under the concept of habeas corpus in Anglo-American jurisprudence, persons who are deprived of their liberty have the right to challenge the legality of their arrest or detention through a judicial inquiry. Habeas corpus is a Latin phrase meaning \u201cproduce the body.\u201d By means of the writ of habeas corpus a court may order the state to \u201cproduce the body,\u201d or hand over a prisoner so that it might review the legality of the prisoner\u2019s detention.<\/em><\/p>\n

[8]<\/a>\u00a0The\u00a0Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/strong>\u00a0is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages.<\/em><\/p>\n

[9]<\/a>\u00a0An\u00a0encyclical<\/strong>\u00a0is\u00a0<\/em>a papal letter sent to all bishops of the Roman Catholic Church, or to all the bishops within one country. Thus, you can see how unusual it was for Pope John to address \u201cPacem in terris\u201d to \u201cAll men of good will.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

[10]<\/a>\u00a0Nikita Khrushchev<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0(1894-1971) led the Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War, serving as Premier from 1958 to 1964 and as first secretary of the Soviet Communist Party from 1953-1964. Though he largely pursued a policy of peaceful coexistence with the West, he also played a major role in instigating the Cuban Missile Crisis by placing nuclear weapons in Cuba, 90 miles from Florida. At home, he initiated a process of \u201cde-Stalinization\u201d that made Soviet society less repressive and a bit more liberal; and also oversaw the developing Soviet space program. With the resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis in late 1962 he, along with President Kennedy, took definite steps across the next few months toward resolving the problems between the Soviet Union and the United States, as described in this article, which ultimately resulted in the Limited Test Ban Treaty. In October, 1964, not quite a year after the assassination of JFK, Nikita Khrushchev was deposed from power and replaced by Leonid Brezhnev. Without Kennedy and Khrushchev their two countries slipped back into the prior Cold War pattern which would continue for another generation until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.<\/em><\/p>\n

[11]<\/strong><\/em><\/a>Norman Cousins<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0(1915-1990) was an American journalist, author, professor and ardent supporter of world peace and nuclear disarmament. From 1942-1972 he was the editor in chief of the magazine Saturday Review and under his watch its circulation expanded dramatically, from around 20,000 to over 600,000. In the 1950s, observing the threat of the arms race, he became chairman of the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE) which warned that in continuing the arms race the major powers were charting a course to disaster. He also wrote a number of articles and books promoting disarmament and world peace. His prominence as a journalist and anti-nuclear peace advocate were likely the major reasons he was selected by Pope John XXIII to be his emissary to and between Khrushchev and JFK. He wrote a book,\u00a0The Improbable Triumvirate<\/strong>, about his experiences during his missions on behalf of the Pope to Khrushchev and Kennedy which is well worth the read, though a bit hard to find. Later in his life, due to his own experiences with severe illness, Cousins conducted research into the effect a positive attitude, optimism and just plain laughter had on illness and wrote a book on the subject. Norman Cousins died of heart failure in 1990. He was 75 years old.<\/em><\/p>\n

[12]<\/a>\u00a0John Locke<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0(1632-1704)<\/em>\u00a0was an English philosopher and physician, widely regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers. (<\/em>also called the Age of Reason, and extending from the mid 1600s to the late 1700s, the ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the monarchy and the Church and paved the way for the political revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries.)\u00a0<\/em>Considered one of the first of the British empiricists (simply stated Empiricism is the theory that human knowledge is derived primarily from observation and perception), his work greatly affected the development of epistemology and political philosophy. Locke\u2019s writings influenced Voltaire and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, many Scottish Enlightenment thinkers, as well as the American revolutionaries. His contributions to classical republicanism and liberal theory are reflected in the United States Declaration of Independence.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Note: I originally wrote and published this article in 2018. I am republishing it now, as its message of our Natural Human Rights and their relationship to the accomplishment of world peace is something everyone should understand. Please read and share. Thank you! MA _____________________________ Martin Luther King Not too long ago, while doing some […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3,17],"tags":[18,19,21,20],"class_list":["post-234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-home-page-blog","category-human-rights","tag-human-rights","tag-natural-law","tag-pacem-in-terris","tag-pope-john-xxiii"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":255,"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234\/revisions\/255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/counteringculturaldestruction.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}